It was made up of 14 foot square rooms enclosed inside an outer shell. The cube was a three-dimensional puzzle much like a Rubik’s cube. So what was the first cube in “Cube (1997)”? So in “initial” summary, what we saw was what we got. The 2 sequels that followed were designed to tell more the cube’s story developing it into an elaborate franchise. The location, the purpose, and those in charge were left to an ambiguous plotline that was intended to stay unresolved. These points “may” have been the intention of first director / writer Vincenzo Natali, if the film was left “as is”. This was left unresolved, though clarified with the inductions of the films “Cube 2” and “Cube Zero” It was “assumed” to be a private builder or a government project. In fact the creators of this cube were never mentioned.
#Cube escape theatre safe code series
In dialog he suggested “You keep everyone separated so the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing”, which referred to the series of contractors who were hired to construct various parts of the whole. His perspective was further commented by “There is no conspiracy. It was also stated as “operating under the illusion of a master plan”.
The character “Worth” was noted as saying in the “Cube (1997)”, that the cube was a “headless blunder,” with at one point, perhaps having a purpose, but the purpose having been long forgotten”. The follow-ups were “new” inclusions that were developed from the initial idea (All 3 films are quite different but still share the focal aspect of the Cube). This is important as Natali’s initial concept was left as is in the film “Cube (1997)”. Vincenzo Natali was responsible for “Cube (1997)”, but passed when offered to direct the sequels stating that he wasn’t a fan of sequels. To establish a foundation, it should be noted that each of the 3 films were directed by different directors. One could start with “Cube Zero”, but that would take all the fun out of it. The facts are provided to bring clarity to the enigma of the series.įor starters “ Cube (1997)”, was the first, “ Cube 2:hypercube” was the 2nd entry with “ Cube Zero” being the 3rd that actually acts as a prequel leading up to “Cube”. Note: The following provides SPOILERS that should only be referred to “after” viewing the films. My purpose for this article could be extracted from the previous reviews on all 3 films, however I felt it might be better to lay the facts out in a single article that “connects” the 3 movies. This article is not intended to resolve “all”, but to bring clarity on the points made in the films. This of course becomes a frustration to viewers who seek resolution. While there are clues that were incorporated “into” the scripts, it should be noted that keeping aspects of the Cube ambiguous was intended and deliberate. For research this entailed the viewing of all 3 films and whatever filmmaker information I could dig up in regards to uncovering the cube’s purpose. This article was designed with a focus on the Cube film series and to bring some clarity to the cube enigma. The films are set up with captives that awake into this new environment challenged with trying to figure a way out. A pattern to “which” rooms had traps was never established, though we know that they were activated with either motion or sound. The initial cube is a 6-sided room that offers small doors on all sides (leading to other cubes) with lethal booby traps awaiting in some of them. The Cube series is highly regarded as a fantastical and complex franchise that bases its films around the intricacies of a mystery cube.
0 kommentar(er)
